logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.18 2018고단463
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized [2018 Gohap 463] Nos. 3 and 4 shall be confiscated.

from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] Even if the Defendant was not a narcotics handler, the Defendant treated narcotics as follows:

1. The Defendant: (a) purchased a penphone from C and conspired to purchase a penphone (i.e., a one-time penphone; hereinafter “phiphone”) which is a mental medicine with B and a local mental medicine; and (b) purchased a penphone from C, and then recruited it.

Accordingly, on January 20, 2018, B transferred KRW 500,000,000, to the E account in the name of D (Account Number F) known by C, and the Defendant and B transferred KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000 to the Defendant and B, on January 21, 2018, the next day, “Ulsan-gu G Hotel” H, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and approximately 0.56g, among them, was 0.56g, in which the Defendant and approximately 0.14g were divided, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, sold approximately 0.7g philophones.

2. Around January 21, 2018, the Defendant administered opon medication by inserting approximately 0.07g of opononon in H of “G hotel” (one eye for a disposable injection) into a single-use injection machine, dilution with water, and then injecting into the left arms.

3. At around 11:30 on January 22, 2018, the Defendant, holding phiphones, committed a single-use injection device with two opphones 0.07g and 0.06g in each of the foregoing “G hotel” H, and a single-use injection device with one opphones 0.2mlopphones melting 0.2mlopphones.

[2] Although the Defendant is not a handler of narcotics, etc., on December 13, 2017, around 05:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03g of opon into a single-use injection machine in Ulsan-gu Iel on December 13, 2017, and dilution with raw water, and administered them in a way of injecting into the left part of blood.

[2] On August 11, 2017, the Defendant thought that the Defendant would use the money for the Defendant’s daily expense if he/she borrowed money from another person without any income and no other property. Even if he/she borrowed money from another person, he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money.

arrow