The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (one million won penalty) imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is based on the error of the administrative authority when the defendant operated the ridge of this case without reporting by the competent authority for a considerable period of time, and the fact that the production of decentralization by the ridge of this case is an environmentally friendly business, and that the production of ridge of this case is an environmentally friendly business. It is favorable to the defendant that the defendant is waiting for repair by installing waste recycling facilities and filing a report with the competent authority.

However, there is a need to keep the waste from the management and disposal of the waste necessary for raising the bridges. In light of the fact that the bridges of this case do not small the scale of raising the bridges of this case, the period for which the Defendant operated without having reported and installing certain facilities is considerable, in particular, the development restriction area of the land of this case, etc., the punishment imposed on the Defendant is heavy.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.