A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a result of the prohibition of marine speculation of wastes, can be supplied with more waste thanks to the increase in demand for waste disposal, while the Defendant has a limit to the capacity of the Defendant to dispose of wastes. As such, the Defendant, at a place other than the permitted place, installed a breeding house and received more waste than the capacity to dispose of the wastes. Without doing any disposal, the Defendant, while supplying the ridge to a farm farm in the vicinity, was able to obtain profits by receiving disposal costs from the person who discharges the waste, by pretending

1. On July 17, 2013, the Defendant violated the Waste Management Act with respect to the failure to obtain permission for change, and obtained permission for a comprehensive waste recycling business on the waste-generating facilities with the trade name “D” in Si, Gun, instead of Sinnam-do, as of July 17, 2013.

From July 17, 2013 to May 2015, the Defendant newly established four units of facilities where the area of approximately 1,980 square meters is 1,00 square meters between the land, instead of obtaining permission for change from the competent authorities, in Gyeongnam-do, and the Defendant engaged in a comprehensive waste recycling business in a way that the area of approximately 1,980 square meters between the land is able to grow between the land, and the land between the areas is supplied as food to the land manager, and the land manager discharges urines.

2. From July 24, 2013 to May 2015, the Defendant violated the Waste Management Act regarding general waste recycling business without permission: (a) installed a raising facility at the place of business within the boundary of “D Agricultural Cooperative” located in the Kimhae-si E and Kimhae-siF; (b) was entrusted with the disposal of waste equivalent to approximately 13,000 tons from waste producers at the place of business, such as the Busan Environmental Authority, the Busan Environmental Authority; and (c) managed waste by the ridge of neighboring land to the farm where the ridge of neighboring land is entrusted with the disposal of waste; and (d) disposed of waste by the Defendant to the farm where the ridge of neighboring land is supplied to the

3. The Defendant violated the Waste Management Act with respect to the comprehensive recycling business of wastes not reported. From February 25, 201 to August 30, 2012, the Defendant violated the Waste Management Act.