Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 250,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2013, at around 11:10 on November 28, 2013, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim D (the 64 years of age, the son) at the building management office of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, on the ground that “the fluor is not good in view of the aesthetic view of the string of apartment bendrara,” and that “the fluor, the president of the elderly, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, etc., of the victim’s face at least two weeks of treatment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to parts of the victim D's photograph, injury diagnosis report, etc.;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel's assertion on the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant's crime of this case is passive resistance and constitutes self-defense or legitimate act. However, according to the evidence adopted earlier, the defendant and the victim are fighting with each other and the defendant suffered bodily injury. In light of the degree and method of the defendant's assault and injury, the defendant's act cannot be deemed as self-defense or legitimate act, and the above assertion by the defense counsel cannot be accepted.