logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2019.05.30 2018나14456
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiffs and Defendant C are dismissed.

2.(a)

Plaintiff

A, H, AM,N, AO, AP, BC, BD, BE, a foundation.

Reasons

The grounds alleged by the plaintiffs and defendant C in the first instance judgment are not significantly different from the already asserted in the first instance court.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following specifications, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the 5th 8th 9th 8th 9th 5th 9th 2019, “The appeal was filed, but the appeal was dismissed on November 15, 2018.” The appeal was filed by the said Defendant, but the decision to dismiss the appeal was finalized on January 25, 2019 ( Daejeon District Court Decision 2017No3441 and Supreme Court Decision 2018Do19481).”

6.4 pages 6. The following shall be added to:

Unless there are special circumstances where it is difficult to adopt a judgment of facts in a criminal trial in light of other evidence submitted in the civil trial, it cannot be acknowledged that the facts that the criminal court already became guilty of the same facts are material evidence, even though it is not bound by the fact-finding of the criminal trial.

(Supreme Court Decision 96Da9621 delivered on May 28, 1996). The 6th 9th 6th 9th am “to spring” is deemed to be “to spring and to be contrary to this, as it is merely a presentation of the evidence Nos. 8 and 4 as a defense theory while the dismissal of prosecution is decided.”

Thus, the judgment of the first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and defendant C are dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow