logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.03.07 2018고단2657
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car B i30.

On August 30, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 65 kilometers a speed of 65 kilometers a speed in the direction of the new calendar distance from the shot-distance 5491 citizens of Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, 5491.

At this point, a person engaged in driving service at a point of 30 kilometers per hour, has a duty of care to observe the speed limit and prevent accidents by driving.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and sustained a limited speed exceeding 35 kilometers a hour, resulting in the victim C(65 years of age)'s side side side side side of the victim C(65 years of age) driving on the right side from the left side of the defendant's running direction, taking the front side of the victim C(65 years of age) driving on the right side of the defendant's driving, and suffered a victim's side-to-face-to-face per two months of credit, which requires treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A traffic accident report and an investigation report (the report on the confirmation of the speed of a vehicle through the black stuffs image);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to i30 vehicle booms photographs (scambling a speed) and field photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) and proviso to Article 3(2)2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of a fine (it is not easy that the degree of violation of due diligence and the degree of injury of the victim, etc., but, after the prosecution, the defendant paid eight million won to the victim after the prosecution, and the victim does not want the punishment for the defendant, and the defendant is in depth divided into the defendant

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow