logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.27 2018고단995
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a C SP car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.119% in a section of about 350 meters from the street in front of the frequency at the upstream of the Suamamamamamamamb in Ansan-si, Ansan-si to the 321st day of the same Gu.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the SPP site in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Egress after accidents).

On November 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:35, and continued to drive the above vehicle at an immencing speed from the front of the Gosan elementary school in Ansan-si to the ethic air. The Defendant was responsible for the duty of care to prevent accidents and safely drive the vehicle by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to drive his vehicle while driving the vehicle at the direction of the defendant's proceeding, and received the back wheels part of the victim's E-driving car's left side in front of the left side of the defendant's vehicle.

Defendant at the same time, the victim suffered injuries, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant parked without immediately stopping the damaged vehicle and taking necessary measures, such as taking relief measures, even though the repair cost was damaged by the damaged vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant on the second public trial date;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (report on the recording of telephone conversations between harvested persons G);

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis and estimate;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow