A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty years.

Seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

A person for whom an attachment order is requested;

Criminal facts

In addition, the facts leading up to the request for attachment order / [criminal facts] Defendant and the person who requested attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) committed each of the following crimes under the influence that the Defendant and the person who requested attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) have no ability to distinguish things or make decisions, due to the tide, such as overworking, damage, damage, actual verification of evidence, damage to judgment, and other mental symptoms.

1. The Defendant, without any special occupation, was a person who lives with the basic old age pension and basic living expenses, and due to the victim C ( South, 77 years old) who had an interest at the time of around 2002, supported the Defendant’s living expenses.

I thought that while being dissatisfied with the victim, I tried to murder the victim.

On November 26, 2016, the Defendant placed excessive (10cm in length, 20cm in length, 10cm in length, 20cm in total) used at a house around 09:20 on November 26, 2016, in both sides of the Defendant, and entered a room near the “Enb” store operated by the victim of the Dansan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

The Defendant: (a) sent the victim to the victim in front of the inside room, called “string the victim into the inside room,” (b) taken the victim into the inside room, taken the transition that the victim gets into the inside room, kids the victim’s neck into the inside room, followed by the inside room, and followed by the victim’s neck on one occasion; (c) continued to escape from the store to the outside, and (d) caused the victim to die by a knife more on the part of the victim from the opening to the knife, and then died of the victim by the knife.

Accordingly, the Defendant murdered the victim.

2. The Defendant, a special injury, at the store of “E Schlage” in the same day and around the same day as those mentioned in the preceding paragraph, indicates that the Victim F (M. 74) who was the wife of the above C (M. 1) who observed the Defendant, tried to deprive the Defendant of the excessive nature of D and C, who was in his possession of the defective and dangerous articles.