beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, with respect to the Defendants, two years from the day when this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[The crime structure and public offering] Defendants are the persons who have applied for a security loan on deposit basis with the victim’s “H Credit Cooperative” (hereinafter “HF”) by means of a false lease agreement, etc.
H In the case of a person who has entered into a housing lease contract under the Housing Act, a lease deposit is secured, a lease contract satisfies certain requirements, such as a lessee's qualification, and if a person files an application for a loan with only certain documents, such as a lease contract (a lease contract) and a certificate of employment, a lease security loan system is operated.
Accordingly, the Defendants applied for a security loan on a deposit basis of a false lease contract, etc. on the basis of the following: (a) the Defendants applied for a security loan on a deposit basis to HF which is relatively difficult for the examination of documents; (b) the Defendants applied for a security loan on a deposit basis of the loan Broker I, J, K, L, and H-K loan director M; and (c) M applied for a security loan on a deposit basis of a false lease contract, etc.; and (d) M applied for a security loan on a deposit basis of forgery of a lease contract necessary for the application for a loan, a certificate of employment, and a detailed statement of the transfer household inspection, etc., with the internal documents necessary for the loan such as a false security inspection report, and conspired to receive a security loan on a deposit basis with the consent of the president of H
1. According to the above public offering, Defendant A (I, M in succession with the above public offering), Defendant A (I), who applies for a false security loan of lease on a deposit basis as a lessee, would have the Defendant A punished the money on the face of the lease only by the name of the tenant.
Upon proposing “A”, Defendant A consented thereto, and preparing documents related to loans of KRW 200 million,00,000,000,000,000,000 from the victim H, located in N in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul on November 5, 2015, Defendant A prepared in advance with false content, “O 216 Dong 1002,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000