logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.11.19 2014고정1546
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Around July 19:30 on July 7, 2014, the Defendant driven a motorcycle without registration, which is a motorcycle, under the influence of alcohol of about 0.117% of the blood alcohol concentration at the 1km section from the Do in the front of the written elementary school in Yan-dong, Young-si to the same ri Ambassador Ambassador.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, at around 19:30 on July 7, 2014, the Defendant operated the “Sim 100 sib”, which is a motor vehicle, without purchasing mandatory insurance from approximately 1 km to the same ri Ambassador distance from the front of the Do-dong Seoul Metropolitan Government document, to the same Do-dong Do.

Accordingly, the defendant operated a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. A report on requests for appraisal, and a written report on the driver's license;

1. Application of statutes on the details of mandatory insurance for motor vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting the crime, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the point of operating cars not covered by mandatory insurance), and selection of fines (the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and that the defendant has no specific penalty power except once a fine, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow