logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고정302
폭행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 22, 2016, around 09:08, the Defendant: (a) taken photographs of the victim’s cell phone on the ground that the victim, who was shot in front of the 102-dong, Gwangju Northernbuk-gu, in the process of having the victim go to the victim for the exercise of the right to interview with the victim D (the 32-year old-old) on the said 102-dong apartment house; and (b) took photographs of the victim’s cell phone on the ground that the Defendant, who was not the son of the son, did assault the victim by taking the victim’s cell phone from deduction of the victim’s cell phone, and

2. Although the Defendant and the defense counsel have met the victim at the time and place stated in the facts charged, the Defendant did not assault the victim.

3. Determination

A. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the victim is entitled to take photographs of the victim to E, who is the child of the defendant with interest on 09:08 on October 22, 2016, and then, he/she presents his/her own right to the defendant at once to his/her own right to the defendant, and if he/she exercises assault against the author, he/she will be reported as a crime of assault.

The Defendant sent the message “,” and sent two photographs showing his hand, etc. and one photograph marked by the Defendant, and the Defendant may recognize the fact that the victim tried to photograph the Defendant with his cellular phone.

B. However, according to the evidence submitted by this court, the following circumstances are revealed.

1) Examining the text message sent by the victim to E before and after the instant case as a whole, the fact that the victim seems to have been assaulted by the Defendant is merely 3 copies of the above text message and the photograph, and the remainder is the fact that the victim did not go directly to E.

2) Among the photographs sent by the victim to E, the victim’s photograph pictures do not have any scambling of external wounds even if taken, and the Defendant’s photograph could not be anticipated even if taken.

arrow