The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that the defendant sent text messages to I's cell phone on October 6, 2012, around 10:36, and immediately knew the victim, etc., the final destination of the letter text messages sent by the defendant to the above date shall be deemed the victim, and the defendant's text messages sent to I shall be deemed the victim, but the court below acquitted the defendant of this part of the facts charged, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (a fine of eight million won) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On or after September 201, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the victim D to continue to work in the Hague; and (b) on October 6, 201, on the ground that the victim was living together with his/her father by unanimous adjudication, the Defendant and the victim sent his/her cell phone, his/her father, which is his/her father, with the victim’s his/her his/her his/her his/her his/her father, to the victim’s wife, so that the Defendant and the victim reached the victim’s fear or apprehension. (b) On October 10, 2011, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s words “on or around 10:36, the Defendant sent the victim’s cell phone, which is his/her father, with his/her mother, without any evidence to see that the Defendant would have reached the victim from the beginning; and (c) the Defendant was aware of the victim’s photograph and the Defendant’s photograph and the Defendant’s photograph and photograph and so on.