logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1978. 7. 11. 선고 78다639 판결
[구상금][집26(2)민197,공1978.9.15.(592) 10976]
Main Issues

The scope of claims which a surety who has lost ownership of secured real estate due to a successful bid shall be claimed from an obligor.

Summary of Judgment

The scope of the right to claim compensation against the obligor by the surety who has lost the ownership of the mortgaged real estate due to the successful bid is equivalent to the market price of the real estate at the time the decision to grant the successful bid becomes final and conclusive, unless there are special circumstances.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 441 of the Civil Act

Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant

[Judgment of the court below]

Defendant-Appellant-Appellee

Attorney Lee Jae-nam et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court Decision 77Na137 delivered on March 15, 1978

Text

All appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the Plaintiff’s attorney and the grounds of appeal by the Defendant’s attorney are also examined.

However, according to the records of the court below's reasoning, the court below is justified in holding that the court below is obligated to pay the plaintiff the amount of the compensation to the plaintiff based on the fact that the owner of the real estate offered as security is equivalent to 150 won at the time of the successful bid of the house of this case at December 25, 1968, and that 5,600 won at the market price at the time of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class of the 1st class.

Therefore, all appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Presiding Justice (Presiding Justice)

arrow