beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese occupation occupation period, C, which was inhabited in G G G in the Japanese occupation period, was examined as follows: (a) around June 18, 1913, around 2 years 1210, 27, and 3F 240, respectively; (b) around 2 years 10, 200, 200, 27, and 240, 2000, 2 years 10,000, 2 years 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
B. Each land listed in the separate sheet 1, 3, and 4 (hereinafter “instant land”) is the land divided from each assessment land, and the land listed in the separate sheet 2 (hereinafter “instant land”) is the same as the above assessment land.
C. As to the land of this case 1, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership under each of its names (hereinafter “each of the instant registration of preservation of ownership”) with the Government Registry of the District Court of Suyang-si Branch of the High Government District Court No. 15713, Jun. 28, 1988; No. 28715, Aug. 2, 1996 with regard to the land of this case 2; and No. 30700, Oct. 13, 1995 with respect to the land of this case 3; and No. 3054, May 24, 1960 with respect to the land of this case, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership under each of the instant names (hereinafter “each of the instant registration of ownership”).
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 9, 10, 15, 17, 18, 22 (including various numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) C, the assessment title of the instant land Nos. 1, 2, and 3, was internal cities, adopted G, the assessment title of the instant land No. 4, which is the name of G, and the head of G adopted G, and K, the head of I adopted K, and K adopted the Plaintiff. The above Plaintiff’s fleet died on April 2, 1990, and the Plaintiff’s fleet died, and eventually succeeded to the entire land of this case, which is the instant land No. 3 and G’s property. 2) If so, the registration of preservation of ownership in the Defendant’s claim as to each of the instant land of this case is null and void, and the Defendant’s claim as to each of the instant land of this case is concerned with the Plaintiff.