1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. At the time of the Plaintiff’s Land Survey Project under the Japanese Land Survey Project under the Japanese Land Survey Project, the assessment title of Nos. 644 and No. 458 before J was K.

In the above land, the land was partitioned into a 450 square meters (136 square meters) and a 162 square meters (49 square meters) for M roads, and the land category was changed to a road, and the administrative district of the above land was changed to Ndong on July 1, 1981.

On June 20, 1986, the Defendant publicly announced non-owned real estate with respect to each of the above lands, and completed the registration of preservation of ownership on March 10, 1987 under the receipt of the Gwangjin-gu District Court’s Seoul District Court’s broad name registration office (hereinafter “instant preservation registration”), and on September 21, 1987, combined the above land with G 612 square meters in light of light name (hereinafter “pre-merger 612 square meters in light of light name”), and re-merged into F road 6,981 square meters in light-si on June 5, 1995.

The address of K at the time of the above circumstances (1912), the name of K, the name of the above circumstances, is O in the male father of G, P, the name of the family register of R, the name of which belongs to the book other than South and North as a rice warehouse of Q agency after Joseon, and R, the name of the family register was S.

K on January 29, 1929, after the death of the Republic of Korea on January 29, 1929, the Republic of Korea succeeded to property, but died on December 7, 1974.

T married with U and D, and married with V in 1950 after divorce, and the remaining plaintiffs were their children, but V also died in 2001, thereby succeeding to the same shares as stated in paragraph 2 of the claim.

Since the Plaintiffs are the inheritors of K-Nam, who are the title holder of the land prior to the merger, the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for cancellation of the preservation registration of this case to the Plaintiffs, and to confirm that the land prior to the merger is the joint ownership by shares of the Plaintiffs.

2. Determination Gap evidence Nos. 1-11 (including paper numbers), light watching viewing, Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, and Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office is insufficient to recognize that R, which had a family register as a conciliation division of the plaintiffs, was the same as K and the same person, who had a family register as G, which had a family register as a land survey injury, as the assessment title of the land survey injury.

The plaintiffs' claims are.