1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the funds ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the Parties) Defendant New Zealand Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant New Zealand”).

(1) From April 2007, 2007, 5 units of P apartment with a scale of 498 units (hereinafter referred to as “instant apartment”) in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu.

(1) The Defendant Gold Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Gold Bank”) is a company selling in lots.

(2) The Plaintiffs enter into a contract with Defendant New Zealand to sell each of the instant apartment units as indicated below (hereinafter “instant supply contract”) or succeed to the rights and obligations of the initial buyer as a seller, and the initial buyer took over the damages claim arising from the instant apartment sale advertisement to the Defendants and completed the assignment of claims.

Of the apartment units of this case, 1 A 102 402 402 202 229,000 220 40 202 202 202 104 202 1102 1102 27 August 30, 2008 (the size and the sale price shall be as stated in paragraph (1) 1) 3 C 103 203 202 204 205 207 204 205 207 2014 204 207 205 204 204 207 204 207 204 205 204 207 204 205 207 204 204 207 205 204 207

The present status of labeling, advertising, and the present status of the apartment of this case is as follows.