Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the defendants are every 3 years.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the FF Project Bureau under the E University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation and the G Project Association, and Defendant B is the vice head of the said Project Association.

1. The Defendants and H conspired to collect the cost of production of the website from the victim E University Industry Cooperation Foundation as if they were produced on the website of the FF Bureau in the H and H’s operation of I, and as if they were produced on the website from the above I.

On October 26, 2009, the Defendants: (a) around October 26, 2009, at the office of F business Bureau located in the Nanannam-gun University, the Defendants had the J of the said business Bureau personnel demand the victim’s expenditure officials to charge KRW 7,00,000 for the cost of creating the website as if the Defendants produced the website at I.

However, in fact I did not produce the FI's website.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the person in charge of the disbursement of the victim as above and let the person in charge of the disbursement transfer KRW 7,00,000 to H's or K's Agricultural Cooperative account as the cost of production on the same day.

2. The Defendants and L/M co-principaled Defendants and L/ and M conspiredd to collect the costs of purchasing earth and carbage from N from the FF Bureau Administration L, N, and from the above project team, as they purchased earth and carbage from N to the victim E-Industrial Cooperation Foundation.

On January 11, 2010, the Defendants demanded L to claim purchase cost of KRW 3,044,000 from N to the victim, as the Defendants purchased earth and carbage from N.

However, in fact, the project team did not purchase earth and mileage from the above temporary border N.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the person in charge of expenditure of the victim as above and let the person in charge of expenditure transfer KRW 3,04,00 to the M’s new bank account, thereby deceiving the person in charge of expenditure.

3. The Defendants are the victims of personnel expenses.