beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months, and Defendant D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant C was sentenced on February 6, 2014 to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on February 6, 2014, and the judgment is the same year.
5.9. Finality was established.
Defendant
A, while importing a car from the U.S. and selling a car from the U.S., he was unable to repay the repair cost of the K KWW car under the U.S. J and was urged to pay it. In addition, due to personal debt, A was subject to severe pressure. L’s proposal in collusion with Defendant B, Defendant D, etc. in order with L, and used the money borrowed from the insurance company, through Defendant C, who is a specially related type of employee in charge of M in Sung-nam Branch Co., Ltd., for the purpose of facilitating the handling of the accident and by facilitating the disposal of the accident.
1. On December 2, 2012, Defendant A, and B committed the fraud of Defendant A, B, and C (hereinafter referred to as “competing crime”), Defendant A and B shared their respective roles by intentionally receiving L’s insurance proceeds by intentionally taking out L’s accident at the lower end of Busan, but Defendant A asked Defendant C to take out the accident.
Defendant
C around the 9th day of the same month, the victim Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. reported as if the insured incident occurred due to the negligence that the victim Samsung F&M Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. was responsible for receiving the accident at the P&M car in the Busan F&M-dong, and notified B of the phone number as if the insured incident occurred. The defendant B received the phone from P, a person in charge of the Samsung F&M, from the above Samsung Fire Co., Ltd. on the 10th day of the same month.
However, the above accident was caused by the defendant C's intentional shock of the vehicle A parked in advance, and only used the personal information of the friendly arrestO of the defendant C, and theO did not relate to the accident.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with L.