logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.22 2019고단332
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, each of the above Defendants is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange, induce, induce, or compel commercial sex acts for business purposes.

The Defendants are to operate the 'D' business from the second floor of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, and Defendant A, as a main business, planned to take charge of the overall operation of the business, and Defendant B, as the chief of the management office, planned to receive monthly pay of KRW 2 million from Defendant A to take charge of the management of customers, sexual traffic women, etc.

Accordingly, from May 9, 2018 to September 7, 2018, Defendants employed sex trafficking women, including E, and sought from many unspecified male customers, to receive KRW 100,000 to KRW 110,00 as the price for sexual traffic, and let the above E, etc. do sexual intercourse with male customers.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of business registration certificate, real estate monthly contract, and field control photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Reasons for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The scope of punishment by law: One to seven years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (decision of types) shall be limited to the scope of recommendations (decision of types) according to the sentencing guidelines, the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older, and there shall be no mediation, etc. of sexual traffic [the category 2] by business, receipt of prices, etc. [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and four months.

3. The Defendants’ crime of this case committed by the Defendants in the instant case is an act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflect their mistakes in depth.

arrow