beta
Text
Defendant
A A The fine of KRW 3 million, the fine of KRW 6 million for Defendant B, and the fine of KRW 6 million for Defendant C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who operates the “E” in Kimpo-si D, and Defendant B is a person who actually operates a manufacturer of kitchen supplies with the trade name of “C” in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and Defendant C is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing kitchen supplies.
When a foreigner intends to engage in an employment in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, and no person shall arrange or obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities for foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, and shall
1. On May 9, 2017, Defendant A arranged for employment of a female G, China, as a general tourism (C-3-9), to a stock company operated by Defendant B, to which Defendant B would not engage in employment as a daily employee, and paid KRW 10,00 (10,000) out of the daily allowances received by the said G, as a referral fee, as well as receiving a referral fee. Defendant A agreed to receive an amount of money equivalent to KRW 10,000 (10,000) out of the daily allowances received by the said G to five foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible to engage in employment two times, such as the attached list I of crimes List I.
Accordingly, the defendant arranged the employment of foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.
2. Defendant B, as a general tourism (C-3-9), shall employ a female G in China, who is a Chinese employee, to engage in job-seeking activities, as a daily employee in the business of producing a kitchen supplies in the above joint stock company, and shall pay the remuneration equivalent to 60,000 won per day from May 18, 2017.
5. Until September 19, 100 employed 10 foreigners who had no status of stay eligible for employment as shown in Appendix II, including two days employed by them.
As a result, the defendant does not have the status of sojourn that can work.