Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 28, 1986, the Plaintiff joined Dong-dong Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “Non-Party Company”) and worked as a member of the luxane, who retired on November 1, 2013. The Plaintiff asserted that the noise department had worked for a long period to return to the left and right. The Plaintiff claimed disability benefits to the Defendant on May 9, 2014.
B. On June 2014, from July 2014 to July 2014, the Defendant original disposition made the Plaintiff receive a special medical examination (hereinafter in this case’s special medical examination) and then decided that the Plaintiff’s disability grade subparagraph 7 of grade 10 of the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act [Attachment 6] (a person who was unable to find out the general cancellation rate at a distance of at least one meter from both the hearing power of two ear) (hereinafter in this case’s disposition) was determined to be “the Plaintiff’s disability grade” (hereinafter in this case’s disposition) after obtaining the result of “59.1dB returning to the right, the left, 91.6dB, 191.6dB on the left, 65dB on the right, and 14.
C. The Plaintiff filed a request for review against the instant disposition, but it is reasonable to view the Plaintiff’s right-hand turn-on power measured by a special dust in light of the characteristics coming from both sides, and the Plaintiff’s final disability grade was dismissed on February 10, 2015, and was dismissed on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s petition for review was filed on July 16, 2015, on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s petition for review against the instant disposition was confirmed to have exceeded 85dB on the basis of the result of the working environment measurement conducted by the Plaintiff’s workplace to which the Plaintiff belongs, but was dismissed on the same ground.”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 7, 8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion has consistently undergone a medical examination by the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service, the Dong Branch Hospital of the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service from 2010 to 2013 at the time of receiving the medical examination by the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service, and the Plaintiff’s disability grade is at least 80dB, and the Plaintiff’s disability grade is at least class 9 of the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.