Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for the crime of the 2016 senior group 3950 case, and imprisonment for the crime of the 2016 senior group 4116 case.

Punishment of the crime

【2016 Highest 3950 [criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on August 30, 2012, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Child Training Correctional Institution on February 14, 2013.

[Criminal Facts] Around June 15, 2015, the Defendant is running real estate trade and loan business with the victim L from K Sarina located in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J around June 15, 2015. The monthly income amounting to KRW 500-9 million.

It is expected that they will pay money because they are unable to get married.

I would like to lend the interest from the lending of money to that person and to pay money to that person.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not actually engage in real estate sale and loan business, and around that time, the Defendant was unable to borrow KRW 00 million from C, etc. and to repay the money, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay the money from the damaged party.

On June 15, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account of the Defendant on June 15, 2015, and obtained a total of KRW 5,865 million from around that time to August 16, 2016, as shown in attached Table 1, from around that time, and obtained a total of KRW 5,865 million from August 16, 201.

【2016 Highest 4116 [criminal records] Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on August 30, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 23, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On January 31, 2012, the Defendant calls the victim M at a non-permanent place and calls the victim M, and “The Defendant has mincing 2 punishment at the clothes shop N, and at this point, has to return clothes without paying KRW 10 million at this point.

10 million won was loaned to 10 million won, which was called as "the full payment is to be made."

However, in fact, since the defendant did not have certain income after the closure of a book that was operated by him and did not have any specific property, he borrowed KRW 10 million from the injured party.