The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The court of final appeal may examine and determine only to the extent of filing an appeal based on the grounds of final appeal. As such, the grounds of final appeal specify the grounds of final appeal and state specific and explicit reasons as to which part of the judgment below is in violation of the statutes, and if the grounds of final appeal does not state such grounds, it is inevitable to treat the grounds of final appeal

(See Supreme Court Decision 98Da41377 delivered on April 23, 199, etc.). The petition of appeal in this case does not state the grounds of appeal, and the grounds of appeal are as follows: "The plaintiff's attorney, etc. was present in the first instance court that the part of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff was not reflected in the trial, and the plaintiff's attorney, etc. was not examined, and the court below also stated that the appellate brief was filed with the help of the attorney or certified judicial scrivener, but did not do so due to financial problems." Thus, the above statement in the grounds of appeal does not state specific specific grounds of appeal as to what part of the judgment below violated the law, and therefore, it cannot be viewed as a legitimate grounds of appeal.

In addition, it is argued that the statement has been made in the hearing.

Even if examining the records, the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations in violation of the rules of evidence.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by the assent of all participating Justices, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition.