logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고합669
강간미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 28, 200, the Seoul High Court sentenced the Defendant to an order to attach an electronic tracking device for four years and seven years on March 18, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 20, 201, on the ground that the Defendant and the person who requested the order to attach an electronic device (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) were sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims Thereof (Rape, etc.) at the Seoul High Court on April 28, 200; and on May 14, 2004, this court was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims Thereof (Rape, etc. of Minors under the age of 13); and on March 18, 2011, the Seoul High Court sentenced the Defendant to an order to attach an electronic tracking device for a period of four years and seven years, respectively, on December 21, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around October 17, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (sexual traffic) provided that, around 03:40 on Oct. 17, 2017, the Defendant sent 140,000 won to a person with a name-non-dissipatedctel Ctel 1703, Nam-gu, Incheon and then sent 1.40,000 won to a person with a name-dissipated sexual intercourse

2. The Defendant attempted rape on the ground that, at the above date, at the above date, and at the above place, he did not have been able to resolve the sexual intercourse with the above victim D on one occasion, but did not intend to commit rape on the part of the above victim on the ground that the above victim's sexual intercourse was not resolved properly due to the Red Sea, but on the ground that the Defendant did not request again sexual intercourse with the above victim, but was refused, the Defendant attempted to commit rape on the part of the above victim. The Defendant did not commit rape on the part of the above victim on the part of the police officer who called out to have been arrested by the victim on the part of the victim on the part of his sexual intercourse. The Defendant saw the victim on three occasions with the victim's face at the above time and in order to commit rape, the Defendant did not commit rape on the part of the victim on the part of the victim, and attempted to commit rape on the part of the victim on the part of the police officer who was dispatched

[The facts leading to the attachment order] The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a sexual crime as stated in the above crime records and paragraph (2) of the judgment, and committed a sexual crime within 10 years after the completion of the execution of the sentence, and was tracking the location of the sexual crime.

arrow