The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 23, 2018, the Plaintiff, when faced with a motor vehicle, was placed in the emergency room of the Southern University Hospital prior to its operation at the address of the side lurgosis, balone, and the back lurgium. At the video inspection conducted at the time, the Plaintiff was verified of the damage to the lurgium, the right 10, 11, and 12, and the lurgical lurging procedure on the day the lurgical lurging procedure was conducted, and was hospitalized in the area outside of the credit and received the preserved treatment.

6. 30. Discharge.

B. On February 13, 2019, the Plaintiff: (a) sent the two copies, telegraph dump dump, fish dump, and so on to undergo an inspection after being hospitalized in a major lake and marsh; and (b) the Plaintiff was hospitalized in a major lake and marsh.

2. 14.In undergoing an examination by being hospitalized into an external trauma, the same year is to take into account the negotisis after the discovery of non-spopic chronronsis of a size of 4m from the upper right beeral chronsis (traffic connection) to take into account the negotisis after the negotisis;

3.12. The person who was discharged on the same year; and

3. The same year after he/she was hospitalized into an outcoming surgery on 29.

4.3. The same year when he/she takes a procedure for pressing and cerebral maleing under the general anesthesia;

4. The discharge was 16.

C. Although the Plaintiff was originally planned to discharge on April 10, 2019, the Plaintiff refused to discharge the Plaintiff, asserting that medical expenses, including the above operation expenses, should be settled as the automobile insurance proceeds under the said traffic accident on the day before the scheduled date of discharge, and discharged the Plaintiff on April 16, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, 4, Eul evidence 1 to 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff, as a traffic accident patient prior to March 29, 2019, was hospitalized in the Defendant’s operating hospital as a payment guarantee by the automobile insurance company B, and was hospitalized in the Defendant’s operating hospital; and (b)

4.3. Annivers and beer surgery;

At the time, the plaintiff was performed with the knowledge that the above symptoms were caused by traffic accident after the traffic accident, and the medical expenses including the operating expenses were settled in B corporation.