1. The part against Plaintiff A in the judgment of the first instance, including claims extended and reduced in the trial, is as follows:

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a doctor who operates D Sung-type department (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

Plaintiff

A was conducted by the Defendant at the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff B was the spouse of the Plaintiff.

나. 원고 A는 2011. 1. 6. 피고 병원에 내원하여 피고로부터 양안(兩眼)에 쌍꺼풀 수술을 받았으나 양쪽 쌍꺼풀의 형태가 비대칭되어 2011. 3. 25. 피고로부터 CO2 레이저를 이용한 쌍꺼풀 재수술(이하 ‘이 사건 수술’이라 한다)을 받았다.

다. 이 사건 수술 직후 원고 A는 시야가 뿌옇게 흐려져 앞이 제대로 보이지 않았고, 곧바로 E 안과와 F 안과의원을 거쳐 피고와 함께 분당서울대학교병원에 내원하였다. 라.

At the time of the establishment of the Seoul National University Hospital, the Plaintiff’s condition was diagnosed by both sides of the mouth and each tent, and specifically, at the center of each part of the Plaintiff’s wells, 4,000 injury was incurred in each part of the body, and 3,000 injury was incurred in each part of the body (hereinafter “the injury in this case”) in each part, and the modification body in the unit was normal, but it was difficult to find out whether the friendly body was damaged.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

Plaintiff

A, on March 25, 2011, the Seoul National University Hospital was hospitalized in the above hospital on March 26, 2011, and discharged on April 2, 2011, after undergoing both procedures for the installation of a booming and direct attachment of a booming system. On March 26, 2011, A was hospitalized in the above hospital, and discharged on March 30, 201.

F. On May 23, 201, Plaintiff A re-hospitalized the Seoul National University Hospital, and was discharged on the same day after he/she received the opportune dressing and the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic on July 11, 2011, and discharged on October 14

G. The plaintiff A.