Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including a claim modified at the trial, shall be modified as follows:
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.
The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the modification as stated in paragraph 2 and the addition of the decision in the next trial as stated in paragraph 2.
B. 1) Under the fourth sentence of the judgment of the first instance court, the following amendment is made to the effect that “the Plaintiff has the obligation to return....” The second through fifth sentence below is made as follows: “The Plaintiff, upon the decision of the first instance court, should return the instant store from the Plaintiff, paid the remainder of the lease deposit that the Defendant deducted from the lease deposit by the Defendant and paid to the Plaintiff on March 11, 2019. The fact that the repayment of the lease deposit was made on the part of the Plaintiff on March 11, 2019 is either a dispute between the parties or that the Plaintiff has the obligation to return the deposit, and accordingly, the Plaintiff withdrawn this part of the claim upon changing the claim at the trial.
2) The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) adding “(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2017Da225312, 225329, May 16, 2019)” to “see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2017Da225312, 225329)”; and (b) intending to use “the circumstance that the store is being used” under Article 19 of the 9th 19” [On the other hand, the written evidence evidence No. 3 alone is revealed that the Defendant was using the store immediately after the termination of the instant lease contract and directly after the conclusion of the instant lease contract, or that there was no objective material related to the grounds for rejection in the process of viewing the entire purport of pleading in the statement No. 6 of the evidence No.