The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 17:00 on May 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a CST5 car and proceeded along the fourth 4-lane road in front of 636, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, along the same four-lanes of the above road, from the area of bankruptcy remote road to the area of the sloping road; and (b) entered the back road, bypassing the road; (c) although the Defendant has a duty of care to make the right-hand prior to the right-hand and the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand part of the Defendant.

2. The case is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under the main sentence of Article 268(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victim can recognize the fact that he explicitly expresses his intention not to prosecute the defendant on August 26, 2013, which is the date the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.