The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles in the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty on the sole basis of G's statement without credibility even though the defendant did not make a statement to G as stated in the facts of

2. Determination

A. The lower court also asserted the same purport. On this issue, the Defendant and G made a statement in the lower court: (i) the Defendant and his wife met each other at the time and place of the crime; (ii) the Defendant stated that D does not have any intention to be subject to criminal punishment; (iii) the Defendant appeared to have made a statement in accordance with his memory; and (iv) the Defendant appears to have made a statement in the lower court’s manner to have made a false statement to the effect that D does not appear to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to appear; and (iii to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have written.