A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant, along with B, C, D, and E (F on the same day) from around 03:50 on September 8, 2016 to around 05:50 on the same day, used 52 cards from “H” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government by dividing 7 pages of the card by 52: (a) a person who possesses the same number or the same infinial pattern is continuous; and (b) a person who first puts the card on the floor, thereby making a 440,000 won of the total amount of the card, and hereinafter referred to as “hulule”.

2. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily accompanied by a police box consisting of a police box consisting of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Military Police Station that is located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and voluntarily submitted the following facts: (b) stated the name “J”, “cab engineer”, and “K” in the contact box as “I” in the resident registration number column of the upper order that voluntarily submitted the document to the police box for the purpose of exercising the authority by carrying out I’s friendly activities; and (c) forged the portion of the column for preparation and investment in the name of the same person, which is a private document pertaining to the verification of facts among the voluntary submitted document; and (d) issued the police officer, who is aware of the fact at that place, as seen above, the part in the column for preparation of the investment box, which was forged, as if it was duly constituted.

3. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated his/her personal information, such as resident registration number, etc., to Nman, a police officer belonging to the above police station, who was investigating gambling cases at the office M of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Police Station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, as if he/she were I; (b) stated his/her personal information, such as resident registration number, etc.; and (c) submitted it to the Defendant, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the suspect interrogation protocol under the name of I; and (d) stated his/her name, “I” in the Defendant’s statement column using a

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant forged I's signature without authority, and issued N a written protocol of interrogation of suspect containing a forged letter of apology to the N.