logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.10.30 2017고단646
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and ten months.

[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant C] On September 25, 2013, sentenced two years to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for larceny at the Gangnam District Court's Gangnam Branch Branch, which became final and conclusive on October 3, 2013. On May 31, 2016, Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) months of imprisonment with prison labor for night intrusion larceny and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2016.

Defendant

D On July 22, 2015, the Incheon District Court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Epiking Vehicles) at the Incheon District Court on August 2, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 30, 201

Defendant

On May 13, 2016, I was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the National Sports Promotion Act (replacement, etc.) at the Seoul Central District Court on June 13, 2016, and the judgment was finalized on May 21, 2016.

Defendant

N on May 3, 2016, the Chuncheon District Court was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of six months for the crime of forced indecent act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 25, 2017.

Defendant

R On August 9, 2017, in the Chuncheon District Court's original branch, it was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in October, 201 to the violation of the Act on the Financial Industry and the Punishment of Tax Offenses Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 17, 2017.

Defendant

S was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months of imprisonment due to a violation of the National Sports Promotion Act on September 8, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 15, 2016.

[Criminal Facts]

1. No person, other than Defendant A, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant J, Defendant J, Defendant K’s violation of the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Act (reburial, etc.), or an entrusted business entity, shall engage in an act of offering property or property benefits to a person who correctly predicted the result by issuing the right to vote for sports promotion or others similar thereto.

Nevertheless, on December 2012, the Defendants established the AD (AE) “AE”), which is a private Internet sports soil site, in a non-permanent apartment located in the time of the Thailand in Thailand.

arrow