The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A is a second crime (each. ...) in its holding.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each of the punishments (Defendant A and B: imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months and confiscation and additional collection, Defendant G: fine of 4 million won and additional collection, and Defendant J: fine of 2 million won and additional collection) declared by the lower court to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. According to the records of ex officio determination (as to Defendant A), Defendant A was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of public duties for eight months on July 22, 2015 by obstructing the performance of public duties in Busan District Court’s branch branch branch, etc. On July 30, 2015, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 30, 2015. As to Defendant A’s violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, including Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1530 Decided March 25, 2010, respectively, by referring to the crime of obstructing the performance of public duties and the crime of obstructing the performance of public duties after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the crime of obstructing the performance of the said special duties and obstructing the performance of the public duties by taking into account equity with the case of determining it at the same time, Defendant A is deemed to be a violation of the aforementioned Electronic Financial Transactions Act (see, e.g., opening of each of the above crimes of obstructing the performance of public duties before and after the final judgment.

I see that it is.

The above violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and the violation of the National Sports Promotion Act (replacement, etc.).