A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 26, 2014, at around 20:0, the Defendant stated that the Defendant c, “C” restaurant located in Geumcheon-gu, Busan, without paying the food value, puts a plaque, and received a report from the Defendant, that he was sent to the above restaurant, that “I am h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, which was sent to the above restaurant.” The Defendant h h h h h h h h h h of the above restaurant.

When the above E continues to restrain this, and the defendant is likely to wear a lock, the defendant, who was at the above E, has to remove the Nexta in a knife, has the police bomb, have the left 25 cm teared on the left, and assaulted the above E's bridge by walking on several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] : The sentence that has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the 1st category of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 1 year and 4 months): 6 to 1 year [Pronouncement Decision] - Violation of the 1st year and 1st year [Attachment Decision] - Violation of the 1st year and 1st year - Violation of the 1st year and 4th year of the 20th year of the 20th year of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 3th day of the 3th day sentence, the sentence is rendered as above.