The Jeonju District Court Decision 2018Da3054 Decided November 6, 2018 against the Defendant’s Plaintiff is the “instant Claim 1-B.”

Title

A. In the case of the Jeonju District Court 2018Kadan3054 claim filed against the Plaintiff, the said court rendered the following judgment on November 6, 2018.

(The following indication of party is based on this case). The ordered plaintiff is the defendant.

(a) remove 15 square meters in a ship, which connects each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 23, 24, 17, 17, and 1 of the attached Form (attached Form 496 square meters, in sequence, among the areas of 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 23, 24, 17, 17, and 17, in order to connect each point of 18, 19, 20, 21, and 18 of the same map on a part of 174 square meters in the ship, which connects each point of 51 square meters in the same map on a part of 174 square meters; and deliver the part of 174 square meters in the ship, which connects each point of 15 square meters in the same map;

B. From March 28, 2016 to the delivery date of the above part A, the amount of money calculated at the rate of KRW 70,925 per month shall be paid.

B. The Plaintiff filed an appeal subsequent to December 13, 2018, which was subsequent to the lapse of the period of appeal against the above judgment, and the appellate court continues to exist as the court 2020Na2802.

C. The defendant's judgment No. 1-B of the above judgment

The claim amount based on Paragraph (1) (hereinafter “instant executive title”) is “the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 2,855,910 and KRW 70,925 per month from August 6, 2019 to the delivery date of land as stated in Section 1-A of the Disposition 1 of the above Judgment” and applied for a compulsory auction to the Jeonju District Court. The above court rendered a ruling to commence compulsory auction on August 7, 2019 and rendered a ruling to commence compulsory auction for the real estate owned by the plaintiff, and below the procedure for compulsory auction of the case is “the procedure for compulsory auction of this case.”

(1) The Plaintiff’s assertion of the parties to the dispute as to the facts that there was no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s assertion was deposited in repayment of KRW 4,323,586, Feb. 21, 2020 with the Defendant as the principal deposit, thereby repaying all obligations under the title of execution and the execution cost of the compulsory auction procedure of this case.