Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 13, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, who is the Defendant’s university line, by telephone, stating that “The Defendant is a middle and high-speed with the Defendant’s university line, and that the franchise-HG vehicle wurgs up to 28 million won. The remainder of the face value of KRW 10 million shall be purchased at a two-year rate.”
However, at the time, the defendant did not work as a middle and high-speed with the defendant, and even if he received money from the victim because he did not leave the 28 million won vehicle, he did not have any intention or ability to purchase the franchiseHG vehicle.
On May 15, 2012, the Defendant acquired 10 million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on May 15, 2012.
2. On May 16, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant sold a vehicle by telephone to the victim. There is a person who is the head of D in Hyundai Motor Vehicle, who is the head of D, will purchase the franchise HG vehicle at the price of employee sales. It is insufficient to obtain a joint and several guarantee as it is short of 10 million won.”
However, as described in paragraph (1), the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to purchase the franchiseHG vehicle, and did not have any particular income due to lack of a certain occupation at the time. 5 million won has already been granted from the Korea Exchange on January 3, 2012, 1.5 million won from the Myman on February 17, 2012, 1.5 million won from the Myman, 2 million won from the future mutual savings bank on February 20, 2012, 2 million won from the Korea Mutual Savings Bank on March 12, 2012, 2 million won from the Sam Savings Bank on March 9, 2012, 2 million won, and five million won from the Myman Savings Bank on March 9, 2012, and 5 million won was used from the Myman Savings Bank on May 11, 2012, and thus there was no intention or ability to receive additional loans even if the principal is not repaid.
On May 16, 2012, the Defendant took out a loan of 2.5 million won from the Telecommunications Korea Loans Co., Ltd., and accordingly, the Defendant is the victim.