logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고합805
보험사기방지특별법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years and for four years, respectively.

Defendant

C, D, and E are not guilty. Defendant C, D, and E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not substantially impede the exercise of the accused’s right to defense, the facts charged are partially revised and recognized as criminal facts without any changes in indictment.

[Public offering] Defendant A is the representative director of F Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of distant water fisheries, fisheries, and fishery product manufacturing, processing, and marketing (hereinafter “F”), who is in charge of overall business of the company, and Defendant B is the person who is in charge of the representative director of G Co., Ltd., an affiliate company of F, and the person who is in charge of the representative director of F, is the

Defendant

A around June 2013, around 2013, F was not put into the operation of approximately KRW 1.5 billion, but used the maintenance cost, crew expenses, etc. for a long period of less than 600 million, with the intention to receive fire insurance money.

Accordingly, around August 2016, Defendant A agreed to pay 10% of the fire insurance money if the crime was successfully committed with the explanation of the above crime plan to Defendant I and Defendant B, and agreed to the consent of Defendant I and Defendant B, and Defendant B were in charge of the role of direct direction and supervision so that the crime was committed without interruption as a contact book of Defendant A.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 2016, Defendant A and B had a doping that he was responsible for the guard of H on-board vessel A and B, and Defendant B sent I to the Republic of South Africa where H is anchored, and Defendant B had a specific schedule reported from I and had a specific schedule applied for the appropriate time of crime.

As a result, when I, who is not a He's regular seafarer, experienced difficulties in boarding H in the region of the Republic of South Africa, Defendant A instructed F Standing Director D to board I without fail, and Defendant D sent Defendant C, who is the H day mate, through the local staff of Defendant A, to the local staff.

After that, I goes on board H.

arrow