Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.153% from the public domain area to the public domain area of 0.20% from August 8, 2018, the Defendant driven D K3 cars while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.153% from the public domain area.
At the same time, the two-lane roads are two-lanes, and the F rocketing taxi driven by the victim E (the age of 68) is carrying three passengers, including the victim G (the age of 15), H (the age of 16), I (n, the age of 14), and so there was a duty of care to report the traffic situation of the vehicle to the person engaged in driving business well and to accurately manipulate the steering gear and prevent the occurrence of the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not properly operate the steering and brakes, etc., and caused the Defendant’s negligence to shock the upper right part of the Defendant’s passenger car into the front part of the Defendant’s passenger car.
As a result, the Defendant driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, and suffered injury to the victim E, such as malinosis, which does not have any one in the two open to give approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment to the victim G, which is a passenger of the taxi, such as ambry, which requires approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment to the victim G, and ambry, which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the victim H, and the victim I suffered injury, such as ambalin, which is no one in two open to require medical treatment for about 2 weeks.
2. Around 00:20 on August 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a DK 3 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.153% from the section of about 3km from the mutual influence cafeteria to the “C” way located in B in the same city.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A traffic accident report (1, 2, a de facto investigation report).