logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.06.10 2016고단257
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-priced vehicle B.

On November 25, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at around 22:25, driving the said vehicle on the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and driving the four-lane front of the ambro-dong in the Daegu-gu, Seog-gu, Seo-gu into a non-fluor-distance four-lane radius from the front side of the sexual high school to about 60 kilometers under the above road. While the Defendant has a duty of care to care for safe operation by accurately operating the steering direction and brake devices, the Defendant neglected to take necessary measures for safe operation of the ambling vehicle C (46 years old) driving in the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle to ensure that the victims of the ambling vehicle in the front part of the vehicle, and caused the above C to take necessary measures for treatment, such as salt and tension, etc., for about three weeks in need of treatment, and caused the above 2,000 ambling vehicle to repair and repair the ambling vehicle, etc. at the same time, and caused the above 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of seven copies of vehicle photographs to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after an accident) of the relevant Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. In light of the reason for sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the crime of this case is not good.

arrow