A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, criminal facts are specified to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

The defendant operated a large restaurant to the victims of ordinary families in North Korea, and was able to receive a large amount of legacy immediately, and was able to receive a large amount of legacy, and had been able to receive a large amount of legacy by selling them at auction and auction, and had been able to pay their own self-sufficiency.

1. Even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim B at will, the Defendant had expressed his intent to use the money to repay his personal debt, and the Defendant was also in a hostile state of food materials-related business run by the Defendant, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money as if he either used the money or promised to do not have any particular property used or promised

A. On May 31, 2016, the victim’s “the cash for the purchase of apologys” is insufficient.

If an auction is held after purchasing the company's company, the company will immediately pay the company's money in cash.

In the end, “a request to lend KRW 15 million” shall be received from the injured person in the name of the accused from remitting KRW 12 million to the Saemaul Treasury Account (Account Number: C) in the name of the accused;

B. On August 10, 2016, if the victim borrowed KRW 1.1 million to the victim, it would be repaid to the victim within one month as above.

In other words, 110,000 won was remitted to the Saemaul Treasury account (Account Number:D) in the name of the defendant from the damaged person.

2. Even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim E at will, the Defendant had expressed his intent to arbitrarily use the money to repay personal debts, and the Defendant was also in a hostile state of food materials-related business run by the Defendant, and there was no intent or ability to repay the money as if the Defendant either used the money or promised to pay the money for no particular property for the intended purpose

A. On December 22, 2016, the victim’s “the cash for the purchase of apologys” is insufficient.

It is free from lending only 10 days of money.