logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.07.06 2016고정1082
폭행
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of 700,000 won and by a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 24, 2015, Defendant A, at around 21:20 on December 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault against the victim on the ground that the injured party, while drinking alcohol with the victim B (at least 54 years old), etc., who was aware of his/her reputation at a F cafeteria located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was taking an examination that he/she is drinking with another male against the Defendant; and (b) the victim’s breath, flap, flap, flap, and flap.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant B, while drinking alcohol and drinking alcohol to the victim A (the 60-year old age), etc. (the 60-year old age), who was aware of his reputation at the same time and time, deemed that the Defendant attached the victim to another male.

On the ground that the evidence about the verbal facts is considered as a substitute for the evidence, the victim verbally abused the victim's flap granc, which was flaped by flabing the victim's flab, and flabed the victim's flab, and followed the victim's flab, and followed the victim's flab, and followed the victim's flab, and led the

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness H in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the witness B in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not commit violence to the victim, but the victim consistently made the defendant spath from the criminal investigation agency to the court, and consistently made the breath of hand from the defendant.

In making a statement, there is credibility of the statement, and H also made a statement to the effect that it conforms to the victim's statement in this court. The above argument is without merit) / [Defendant B]

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the witness H in the third public trial records;

1. Statement A by a witness among the four-time public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police officer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a medical certificate of injury and photographs of the upper part;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow