Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a B knife car in the course of business.

No driver of any motor vehicle shall change course when it is anticipated to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change course of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 15:20 on February 14, 2019, driven the above vehicle and proceeded along the 12-lane 25 and the road in front of the cargo terminal along the 6-lane in the direction of salt farm distance on the side of the bank in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul. However, even though the 5-laneed vehicle of the victim D (V, 29 years old) driving is proceeding on the 5-lane, the Defendant, due to the negligence of changing the course from the 6-lane to the 5-laneed vehicle of the victim D (V, 29 years old) driving into the left side of the Defendant, conflict with the latter part of the 29-laneed vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the regulations such as securing safety distance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Results from the reproduction and viewing of black boxes, video CDs;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, D's statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the accident site photograph;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, subparagraph 1 of Article 156 and Article 19 (3) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act argues that there is no violation of the Road Traffic Act. However, even if it is confirmed in video, the defendant did not pay sufficient attention while changing the course from his/her lane to that of the damaged vehicle, thereby obstructing the operation of the damaged vehicle, and the defendant's assertion is not accepted since it is minor but minor but it can be recognized that the accident occurred due to the contact), although it is recognized that the defendant's reason for sentencing does not have any particular reflect until now from the investigation process.