logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.18 2018나23895
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. A claim for indemnity related to a traffic accident that occurred as at August 23, 2016 on or around 06:00, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Samsungdong 159 (see attached Form accident site medicine)

2. The instant accident is an accident that is shocked by the front right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “Meet 2 vehicle”) that intends to change the course from the six-lane to the five-lane course of the road in which the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “Meet 1 vehicle”) has changed from the six-lane to the five-lane course. The Defendant vehicle should not interfere with the progress of another vehicle by properly examining the traffic situation of the vehicle intended to change from the six-lane to the five-lane. However, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff also caused the instant accident while changing the course of the vehicle from the five-lane to the six-lane route, and even if it is negligent in performing its duty of care to change the course, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle have contributed to the instant accident by neglecting their duty of care to change the course of the vehicle, in light of the purpose of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s vehicle’s location and the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s 20-lane.

3. The plaintiff's appeal is without merit.

arrow