logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.08.31 2018나2000402
해고무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the modification as stated in paragraph 2 and the addition of the decision in the next trial as stated in paragraph 2.

B. Part 1) The Defendant in Part 2, 13, 2, 13, 2, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200).

3) The first instance court’s decision No. 4 and 8 stated “(the notice of the result of the said disciplinary action is specified by specific grounds and by the date of dismissal)” is added. 4) The “30, 31, and 33” of the first instance court’s decision No. 11 and the “21” of the first instance judgment No. 12 are deemed as “30, 34, 36 through 41, and 44 through 69,” respectively.

5 Then, the judgment of the court of first instance No. 12 of the 12th trial stated the phrase “if there is no limit to what is the case,” and the phrase “if there is any information on various criminal acts committed byG or J, etc. in the internal accusation system of the company,” without mentioning the specific date or contents of the notification in the 6th trial, submitted by the applicant for unfair dismissal relief against the dismissal of the instant case.”

In addition, "the person has added" and "the person has received" in the 13th place.

6. The 12th judgment of the first instance.

arrow