The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person driving B rocketing motor vehicles on duty.

On September 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 15:00 and led to the progress of the withdrawal of the parking lot in the government prison parking lot located in the Gosi-dong, Gosi-si.

In spite of the fact that a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately manipulate the front side and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and prevent the accident from occurring, the defendant was negligent in neglecting it, and the victim C (hereinafter, 33 years old) who proceeds in the parking lot from the left side of the right and the right side of the motor vehicle operated by the defendant on the right side of the driver's vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s salt scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic

2. The judgment of this part of the facts charged refers to Article 3(2) main sentence of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, where a vehicle driven by a defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, it cannot be prosecuted. According to the findings of the court's inquiry into the facts of this court, it can be acknowledged that the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance of the National Litbybyter. Thus, the prosecution against this part of the facts charged is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(2)