logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.08.27 2014가합103747
채무부존재확인(의)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 9,919,887 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from March 7, 2012 to August 27, 2015.

Reasons

1. We also examine the basic facts, the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim.

A. The parties concerned are dentists belonging to the Dental Hospital located in the second floor in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the defendant is a patient who has received crypt treatment from the plaintiff.

B. On June 20, 201, the Defendant complained of the fall of the malicious scrap metal, and applied it to the hospital for the first time. The result of the oral examination reveals that ① the fall of the malicious scrap metal, ② the 36th left-hand side of the Haak, the 10th unit (1:1:18; hereinafter the same shall apply), the 10th unit (21-28), the 10th unit (20th unit from the inside of the Gu river, to the outside; hereinafter the same shall apply), the 10th unit (21-28), the 30th unit (31:38), the 30th unit (41-48), and the 40th unit (41-48) of the Haak-hand left-hand side of the Gu river.

[3] The loss of the value of Daegu 1, 3 the remaining fluoral of the second fluoral, No. 45, the remaining fluoral of the second fluoral, No. 46, and the loss of the second fluoral, No. 47, were confirmed (hereinafter above “

(3) At the time, the defendant did not appeal to the court for a mistake or a certificate (hereinafter referred to as the "responding infant number")

(2) On October 45, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) laid a fluort set (4.3m x 8m; hereinafter “fluort”) after planting the remaining fluort on December 45, 2011; and (b) laid a fluort set (4.8m x 8m x 46m x 46m ; hereinafter “fluort”) on the top of 46 parts; (c) laid a fluort set (4.8m x 8m x 46m x 46m m) and laid the bones.

(4) On October 17, 201, the Plaintiff’s symptoms complaining of the Defendant were presumed to have been damaged by the pressure on the boness and gings below the right side (hereinafter “instant procedure”). On October 17, 201, the Plaintiff removed the existing vertebranes, replaced the new vertebranes with the new vertebrariesing material, adjusted the height of the flag, 45, and removed the flag, 46, and then followed by removing the flag.

arrow