Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The victim F is not a graduate, and the victim G was overlapped, or there was no fact of H-only equipment during the period of the victim G's reduction.

Nevertheless, there is a fact that the defendant reported Internet news, etc.

Trust and good faith.

피고인은 2016. 8. 24. 22:21 경 대구 수성구 I에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서, 인터넷에 접속하여 네이버 뉴스 ‘J' 라는 제목의 기사에 “ 어이 첩 냔 뱅기에 경기하나 봐 경기 잘못하면 뇌 손상 심한데 우 짜 노 그러게 왜 오빠야 감방에 있을 때 뱅 기타고 타녔 노( 이하 생략)” 이라는 댓 글을 게시한 것을 비롯하여, 2016. 2. 20. 경부터 2016. 8. 24. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 총 11회에 걸쳐 피해자 및 피해자의 가족에 관한 글을 게시하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has undermined the honor of victims by openly disclosing facts through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to K;

1. Each complainant's written opinion (Law Firm L and Law Firm M);

1. Details of the relevant articles, the list of comments comments on each posted, the details of the comments on each posted, the certificate of academic perjury, the certificate of registered completion, the letter of confirmation, and the letter of application for carbon;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the posting of comments on the Internet in relation to the victims as stated in the facts charged in this case does not constitute a statement of fact, and that the contents of the posting cannot be deemed to constitute a statement of fact, and that it is for the public interest and thus does not constitute a crime.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., ① the Defendant’s comments on the Internet, as stated in the facts charged of this case, are examined. The main contents thereof are as follows.