The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the pilot of B.

around 15:00 on September 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) requested B to prepare a written confirmation to the effect that “D cafeteria operated by B located in the Northern-gu, Northern-si; (b) the Defendant returned 60gs and gates from South-gu, Southern-si; (c) the Defendant prepared a written confirmation to the same effect; (d) had B affix his signature and seal on the bottom of the written confirmation; and (e) received a written confirmation to the effect that “B returns 60gs and gates and gates, which the Defendant laid down in the south-gu, Southern-gu, and detached house

The facts charged are stated as "the copy of the resident registration certificate has been issued by the victim," but corrected.

The Defendant continued to enter the parts on which B’s signature and seal and the copy of the resident registration certificate were affixed at the above location in a way that it is impossible to identify the part on which B’s signature and seal and the copy of the resident registration certificate were affixed, and then, “B(s)” using a stample on June 20, 2015 with a stample and a 20,000 won for H and I, respectively, shall be paid 1,000 won to H and I, and it is not known until September 2018 (net J-friendly Support Expenses). The Defendant stated “D cafeteria, K, and the above paper was attached by a method that does not identify the part on the bottom, and then copied the documents in the name of B, as if it were the documents of the funeral, using the reproduction machine at a place where it was impossible to identify, and forged the documents.

On October 23, 2018, the Defendant filed an application for provisional seizure against B’s “Ye-gu E and Single Housing” owned by a certified judicial scrivener whose name is not known in the Daegu District Court Port Branch Branch Branch branch, through a certified judicial scrivener whose name is unknown, and submitted the forged certificate to the above court employees who are not aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the certificate, which is a private document under B, and used a forged private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (part);

1. The witness B.