A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:00 on April 19, 2015, the Defendant was divingd on the roadside B of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2015, and “A drinking male is growing on the roadside.” The Defendant, upon receiving a report from 112, her slopingD, Gyeongcheon Police Station C District, who called the site, sent to the site by having the Defendant return home to the site, and her bath the Defendant “I am going to go home” and her drinking to the said D, and her f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the earth's work site;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances) of the suspended sentence (the scope of the recommended sentence) is [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act]. There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months), the basic area (6 to 6 months of the obstruction of performance of official duties) (the special person) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence is against the defendant’s depth, and the fact that there is only a previous conviction