logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2018.11.29 2015가합1170
손해배상(건)
Text

1. Defendant B, C, and D Co., Ltd. are jointly owned with the Plaintiff and KRW 166,986,558.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into a working design service contract and conducted the primary geological survey (1) shall be 2,069m2 (hereinafter “instant site”). The Plaintiff is 2,069m2 (hereinafter “instant site”).

3) On the ground of the water pumps (hereinafter “the water pumps of this case”)

2) The F Improvement Project with the content of the new construction of the F Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant Improvement Project”).

After planning, the Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) is omitted on May 3, 2011.

(i)The execution design service contract for the instant rearrangement project (which includes the pumps, the new construction of the management building and the shop design for the civil engineering works on the site, and the service cost is KRW 147,037,00.

hereinafter referred to as “instant project shop shop shop shop design service contract”

(2) After concluding the instant project implementation design service contract, Defendant A requested a geological survey for design G (hereinafter “instant primary geological survey”). According to the results of the instant geological survey conducted at least two adjacent to the instant site from August 26, 2011 to August 28, 2011 (I), Defendant A was found to have relatively high-quality floors, such as the existence of gravel sand, sand floor, and gravel sand, in order of two places of the survey under the ground surface.

B. The Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works and a contract for responsible supervision services and conducted secondary geological surveys 1) based on the results of the first geological survey of the instant case, as seen earlier, completed the implementation design under the contract for the execution design of the instant improvement project, and on May 15, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works with Defendant D and J as joint contractors (the portion of civil works among the instant improvement projects shall be Defendant D; the construction works shall be executed exclusively by Defendant D; the construction works shall be 71.36%; and the J shall have the share of 28.64%; the construction works finally determined after the initial contract was entered into shall be 4,727,700.

arrow