1. It is confirmed that each insurance contract entered into between the Plaintiff and the Selection B is null and void.

2. The plaintiff, .

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legal entity that carries on insurance business, and the defendant (the appointed party, hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") and the appointed party B (hereinafter referred to as "B"), and both the defendant and the B are married couple.

B. On December 12, 2016, the contractor changed from the Defendant to B each of the insurance contracts listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) between B and B (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

The Defendants, based on the instant insurance contract, claimed insurance money from the Plaintiff due to hospitalization, medical expenses for disease, hospitalization expenses, etc., and received a total of KRW 6,879,244 from the Plaintiff as indicated below, and KRW 12,851,419, respectively.

. Table: 1. Insurance proceeds of 2.3 Nos. 1. 4. 5, 2. G 1. 2. H. 2. 1. 4. 8, 200 to 12. 3. 5, 200 G 2. 1. 4, 200 G 2. 1. 3, 20 G 1. 1. 3, 200 G 1. 5, 200 G 2. 1. 3, 30 G 1. 1. 4, 207 G 1. 4. 1. 4, 207 G 1. 1. 4, 30 G 1. 5, 207 G 1. 4, 36 4. 5, 204 G 1. 1. 65 G 13, 205 837 1. 1. 20